A We all love our city this beautiful, clean and decorated, but not always. The walls are stained, the shutters of shops and numerous rusty "tags" ugly flood walls stylish and clean.
By this I make a reflection about the artistic or beautiful graffiti, and that I personally do not like something artistic act becomes a self-centering and self-propaganda. And synonymous with what I just said, I think many "Tags" (signatures) that are made for loitering or the fault of the police, so pursuing the graffiti artists, can not stand to create works for long.
However, I want you to think I am against the firms, because it is not, but if I'm against those made on monuments, walls or other graffiti pristine more elaborate. I think the tagging is a good quick way to become known as an artist when the site is dangerous (police) or is an impersonal thing as a sign, a trash can, a railing, the metro ... Although I believe in my humble opinion viewer graffiti, graffiti all that is dedicated to making only "tags", without touching the other branches as templates, stick or graffiti should not be considered an authentic graffiti.
I have always admired the art of graffiti templates and with intent to influence society, such as Banksy, an English artist whose works convey a strong sense of art combined with social criticism.
a graffiti artist may get to read this and consider me a "toyaco", as they say, but I want you to think that art often takes into consideration because there are bad people who do not take it seriously. And this happens in all branches of art as the graffiti itself.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u3EsAJONJn8
